Key result
Low DLCO in PAH is linked to higher PVR and poor response to vasodilatory therapy.
Why the study?
The authors aimed to explore whether PAH patients with low DLCO constitute a distinct subpopulation and to describe their clinical characteristics and response to treatment.
Does low DLCO (<45%) identify a distinct subpopulation of PAH patients with different clinical characteristics and treatment response?
Cohort (n=69)
No
Does low DLCO (<45%) identify a distinct subpopulation of PAH patients with different clinical characteristics and treatment response?
PAH patients with DLCO < 45% represent a distinct clinical phenotype with worse hemodynamics and poor response to standard vasodilatory therapy.
Group 1 of PAH patients encompasses patients with a diverse underlying etiological condition, having histological modifications that can affect gas exchange across the alveolar-capillary membrane, as reflected by decreased DLCO. Values of DLCO did not identify the exact reason for their decrease, but they can provide insights into the underlying pathobiology and prognosis of PAH patients. Our aim was to explore whether PAH patients with low DLCO constitute a different subpopulation and describe their characteristics and response to treatment. A total of 69 PAH patients were studied retrospectively and divided into two groups: group 1: DLCO ≥ 45% and group 2: DLCO < 45%. IPAH and PAH-CTD mainly constituted our population. The proportion of IPAH to PAH-CTD was almost the same between the two groups. Patients in group 2 were older (66.83 ± 11.61 vs. 59.27 ± 111.90, p = 0.035), mostly male (47.5% vs. 11.5% p = 0.008), and ever smokers (59% vs. 22%, p = 0.049). They mainly had WHO-FC III (68% vs. 32%) and had received more advanced therapy (40% on triple combination therapy vs. 16%). The two groups had similar mean PAP (group 1 = 32 (22.00–38.00) vs. group 2 = 35 (28.50–48.50) mmHg), while PVR was higher in group 2 (6.49 (4.10–9.52) vs. 3.61 (2.95–5.22) WU). In group 2, neither IPAH nor PAH-CTD patients improved WHO-FC, 6MWD, or NT-proBNP after treatment. In our center, PAH patients with low DLCO had some distinct clinical characteristics, such as poor prognosis and poor treatment response to vasodilatory therapy. Understanding the role of DLCO in both phenotyping PAH patients and in treatment response would be useful in guiding therapeutic approaches, especially now that new therapeutic targets are involved in PAH treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dima et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) (n=69). Low DLCO (< 45%) vs. DLCO ≥ 45% was evaluated on Improvement in WHO-FC, 6MWD, or NT-proBNP after treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: