We consider two desired properties of learning algorithms: sparsity and algorithmic stability. Both properties are believed to lead to good generalization ability. We show that these two properties are fundamentally at odds with each other: A sparse algorithm cannot be stable and vice versa. Thus, one has to trade off sparsity and stability in designing a learning algorithm. In particular, our general result implies that ℓ(1)-regularized regression (Lasso) cannot be stable, while ℓ(2)-regularized regression is known to have strong stability properties and is therefore not sparse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: