High ventricular septum implantation of the Micra pacemaker was associated with a significantly shorter corrected QT interval during pacing compared to low ventricular septum implantation (440 ms vs 520 ms; p < .05).
Cohort (n=15)
No
Does high ventricular septum implantation improve electrical characteristics compared to low ventricular septum implantation in patients receiving leadless pacemakers?
High ventricular septum implantation of leadless pacemakers is safe and may provide more physiological pacing with shorter QTc intervals compared to low septal pacing.
Absolute Event Rate: 440% vs 520%
p-value: p=< .05
OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and electrical characteristics of various implanting sites of the Micra pacemaker. METHOD: A total of 15 patients from Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, were included, who were implanted with Micra leadless pacemakers and allocated to either the high ventricular septum group (eight patients) or the low ventricular septum group (seven patients) based on their individual patient factors and clinical conditions. The baseline of the patients, the implanting area, the electrocardiogram change after implantation, the implantation data, the threshold, R wave, impedance, and the date of the 1-month follow-up were then analyzed. With all of the data, the characteristics of different implantation sites of the Micra pacemaker were determined. RESULTS: Overall, the thresholds were low at implantation and remained stable over the 1-, 3-, 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year follow-ups. On comparing the two groups, there was no difference in QRS duration at pacing (140.00 40.00 ms vs. 179.00 50.00 ms), threshold at implantation (0.38 0.22 mV vs. 0.63 1.00 mV), R wave at implantation (10.85 ± 4.71 V vs. 7.26 ± 2.98 V), or impedance at implantation (906.25 ± 162.39 Ω vs. 750.00 ± 173.40 Ω). While the difference in QRS duration between the two groups was not significant, the QRS duration of the high ventricular septum group exhibited a reduced tendency compared with that of the low ventricular group. The corrected QT interval during pacing exhibited a significant difference (440.00 80.00 ms vs. 520.00 100.00 ms; p .05). CONCLUSION: High ventricular septum pacing appears to be a safe site for implantation of the Micra pacemaker. It could entail a shorter QRS duration at pacing and could be more physiological than low ventricular septum pacing.
Li et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in Micra leadless pacemaker implantation (n=15). High ventricular septum implantation vs. Low ventricular septum implantation was evaluated on Corrected QT interval during pacing (p=< .05). High ventricular septum implantation of the Micra pacemaker was associated with a significantly shorter corrected QT interval during pacing compared to low ventricular septum implantation (440 ms vs 520 ms; p < .05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: