PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2000Magnetic Resonance in Medicine127 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of the quantification precision of human short echo time1H spectroscopy at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla

View Full Paper
RBRobert BarthaDDDick DrostRMRavi S. Menon

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Precise quantification of human in vivo short echo time (1)H spectra remains problematic at clinical field strengths due to broad peak linewidths and low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In this study, multiple STEAM spectra (TE = 20 ms, volume = 8 cm(3)) were acquired in a single individual at 1.5 T and 4 T to compare quantification precision. Test-retest STEAM spectra (volume = 1.5 cm(3)) were also acquired from the anterior cingulate and thalamus of 10 individuals at 4.0 T. Metabolite levels were quantified using automated software that incorporated field strength-specific prior knowledge. With the distinct methods of data acquisition, processing, and fitting used in this study, peak height SNR increased approximately 80% while peak linewidth increased by approximately 50% in the 8 cm(3) volumes at 4.0 T compared to 1.5 T, resulting in an average increase in quantification precision of 39%. Metabolite levels from test-retest data (1.5 cm(3) voxels at 4.0 T) were quantified with similar inter- and intraindividual variability. Magn Reson Med 44:185-192, 2000. Published 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bartha et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2071c1fb035751fb3175d9https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200008)44:2<185::aid-mrm4>3.0.co;2-v
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper