This article assesses how far it is possible to discern any form of what we might term a Whitean sensibility amongst contemporary practitioners of the history of international politics. An audit of contemporary practice reveals a good deal of work which is frankly disappointing by the yardstick of White, some of which reflects at least a degree of sensitivity to his concerns, and some of which demonstrates both his clear stimulus and hopeful portents for the fruitful future application of his ideas. Keywords: Hayden Whiteinternational historytextualityemplotmentpoliticshistoriography Notes 1. I discussed Young's book in an earlier piece in this journal (Finney Citation1997, 367–70). Tellingly, I can think of very few examples of this type of approach that have been produced in the decade since, though I make no claim to have surveyed the totality of output in the sub-discipline. 2. My appropriation of White here somewhat inverts his original point, that the realist intentions of authors cannot be securely realised in narrativising texts. 3. Not that Jackson is by any means a naïve empiricist: he advocates the use of Pierre Bourdieu's social theory to facilitate this new approach – and many culturalists – myself included on occasions – make similar claims for the virtues of their preferred methodologies. 4. There are further stimulating thoughts on the historiography of this subject in Winter and Prost 2005.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrick Finney (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: