Why the study?
Does the combination of global risk score and carotid IMT measurement improve the identification of high-risk patients for primary prevention?
Observational (n=2,142)
No
Does the combination of global risk score and carotid IMT measurement improve the identification of high-risk patients for primary prevention?
Combining global risk scores with carotid ultrasonography identifies a significant proportion of high-risk patients with sub-clinical arterial lesions who would otherwise be missed by risk scores alone.
Low target attainment and subclinical lesions in younger patients signal prevention gaps; supports evaluating combined risk scores plus carotid IMT but should not yet change practice.
Aims Description of cardiovascular risk factor distribution in a primary prevention centre in a cohort of 2142 consecutive high-risk patients and proposal for improving cardiovascular prognosis by combination of risk score and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) measure. Methods and results Two thousand one hundred and forty-two high risk patients including 59.3% men (mean age 51.4 years for men, 55.8 years for women) with an average of 4.7 risk factors/pt were enrolled. All of these patients were referred for clinical examination, biological measurements, stress test, carotid, abdominal aorta and femoral ultrasonography with intima media thickness measurement. Distribution of risk factors is as follows: family history of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) 39.8%, hypertension 23.5%, dyslipidaemia 49.5%, hyperglycaemia 10.6%, overweight 46.7,%, current tobacco smoking 16%, sedentarity 29%. However, treatments targets were reached for only 25% of hypertensive patients, 16.2% for dyslipidaemic patients and 6.8% for patients with hyperglycaemia. This study con.rms the gap between scientific knowledge and current practice. Among patients aged ≤60; 16.8% have a high global 5-year risk score (Framingham) but sub-clinical arterial lesions are found in 59.3% of them. Conclusions In current clinical practice, this study suggests that combination of global risk score with ultrasonography may contribute to better identify high-risk patients and motivate them for cardiovascular prevention. The discovery of vascular damages will lead to an intensive therapeutic strategy even if the risk score seems to be reassuring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Favre et al. (2004) conducted an observational in High cardiovascular risk (n=2,142). Cardiovascular risk factors and sub-clinical arterial lesions was evaluated on Distribution of cardiovascular risk factors and treatment target attainment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: