Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We consider the problem of quantum-state tomography under the assumption that the state is pure, and more generally that its rank is bounded by a given value r. In this scenario two notions of informationally complete measurements emerge: rank-r-complete measurements and rank-r strictly-complete measurements. Whereas in the first notion, a rank-r state is uniquely identified from within the set of rank-r states, in the second notion the same state is uniquely identified from within the set of all physical states, of any rank. We argue, therefore, that strictly-complete measurements are compatible with convex optimization, and we prove that they allow robust quantum-state estimation in the presence of experimental noise. We also show that rank-r strictly-complete measurements are as efficient as rank-r-complete measurements. We construct examples of strictly-complete measurements and give a complete description of their structure in the context of matrix completion. Moreover, we numerically show that a few random bases form such measurements. We demonstrate the efficiency-robustness property for different strictly-complete measurements with numerical experiments. We thus conclude that only strictly-complete measurements are useful for practical tomography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baldwin et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: