Key result
An 8-week sprint interval training intervention did not significantly reduce pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, or carotid intima media thickness in young, healthy men (all P>0.05).
Why the study?
Sprint interval training improves many cardiovascular risk indices, but its effect on emerging indicators of cardiovascular health like arterial stiffness and carotid intima media thickness remains unclear.
Does an 8-week sprint interval training intervention improve arterial stiffness and carotid intima media thickness in young, healthy men?
Does an 8-week sprint interval training intervention improve arterial stiffness and carotid intima media thickness in young, healthy men?
p-value: p=>0.05
An 8-week sprint interval training program does not significantly improve arterial stiffness or carotid intima media thickness in young, healthy men.
No vascular benefit from 8-week sprint interval training in healthy young men; leaves open effects in other populations or with longer durations.
BACKGROUND: Sprint interval training (SIT) has been shown to improve many indices of cardiovascular risk. The effect of SIT on emerging indicators of cardiovascular health, including arterial stiffness and carotid intima media thickness, remains unclear. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess changes in augmentation index at 75 beats per minute (AIx@75), pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), and carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) at three time points of an 8-week SIT intervention. METHODS: ) participated in the study. Subjects trained 3 times a week for 8 weeks. Training consisted of 3-6 consecutive 30-second bouts of maximal intensity cycling, with 4.5 minutes of active recovery between bouts. Baseline, 4-week, and 8-week vascular assessments were performed. Training effects were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Pearson correlations were used to determine the relationship between baseline values and the change scores (baseline to 8 weeks) of each vascular measure. RESULTS: AIx@75 (BL: -3.6±10.9%, 4W: -5.6±8.3%, 8W: -3.2±9.5%), cfPWV (BL: 5.6±1.0 m/s, 4W: 5.8±0.9 m/s, 8W: 5.6±0.7 m/s), and CIMT (BL: 0.51±0.08 mm, 4W: 0.52±0.08 mm, 8W: 0.51±0.08 mm) did not significantly change (all P>0.05). Baseline cfPWV and AIx@75 were negatively correlated to their change from baseline to 8 weeks (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that 8 weeks of SIT is an insufficient stimulus to reduce cfPWV, AIx@75, or CIMT in a group of young, healthy men. Baseline arterial stiffness may modulate vascular adaptations to SIT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagelkirk et al. (2024) studied Healthy. Sprint interval training (SIT) was evaluated on Changes in augmentation index at 75 beats per minute (AIx@75), pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), and carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) (p=>0.05). An 8-week sprint interval training intervention did not significantly reduce pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, or carotid intima media thickness in young, healthy men (all P>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: