Why the study?
Does enoxaparin reduce death or recurrent MI in patients with STEMI after fibrinolysis compared to unfractionated heparin?
Does enoxaparin reduce death or recurrent MI in patients with STEMI after fibrinolysis compared to unfractionated heparin?
Enoxaparin improves 30-day clinical outcomes compared to unfractionated heparin specifically in STEMI patients who achieve complete ST-segment resolution after fibrinolysis, suggesting it prevents re-occlusion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enoxaparin may be preferred over unfractionated heparin after fibrinolysis with complete ST resolution; extends trials by identifying an ECG-defined responder subgroup.
AIMS: To determine the relationship between a strategy of enoxaparin (ENOX), early ST-segment resolution (STRes), and clinical outcomes on patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after fibrinolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline and 180 min ECGs were analysed in 3208 of the 20 479 patients in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial, which randomifzed patients with STEMI to ENOX vs. unfractionated heparin (UFH) as adjunctive therapy. STRes was defined as complete (70%), partial (30-70%), or none (<30%). There was no evidence for a difference in STRes between the groups assigned to the ENOX or UFH (median 69.4 vs. 67.2%; P = 0.13). Among patients with complete STRes (n = 1100), ENOX significantly reduced death or non-fatal recurrent MI at 30 days when compared with UFH (4.4 vs. 9.9%; OR(adj) 0.39; P < 0.001), whereas there was no difference in patients with only partial or no STRes [14.2 vs. 12.5%; OR(adj) 1.0; P = 0.98 (n = 368) and 16.2 vs. 15.9%; OR(adj) 1.0; P = 0.97 (n = 830), P for interaction = 0.008]. CONCLUSION: When compared with UFH, a strategy of ENOX significantly reduces death or non-fatal recurrent MI in patients who achieved complete STRes, but not in patients with less STRes. These data suggest that a strategy of ENOX improves outcomes by preventing re-occlusion in patients achieving initial successful reperfusion after fibrinolytic therapy rather than by facilitating initial reperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scirica et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: