Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scholars disagree on how to read the cross-dressing scene in Dorothea Schlegel’s novel Florentin (1801). While most critics read it as a reinscription of gender normativity, others claim that it challenges gender binaries. In this article I propose a third possibility: contrary to contemporary theory, which posits cross-dressing as a subversive gesture that severs signifier and signified, I argue that the cross-dressing in the novel maintains the essential femininity of the cross-dressing character, Juliane. The subversive gesture in Florentin occurs through rather than against notions of gender complementarity, in part as a displacement of critiques of class distinctions. Since gender complementarity excluded women from the public sphere, Schlegel’s novel constructs alternative possibilities for female self-definition in the private sphere, in the process radically expanding the boundaries of the feminine private sphere.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liesl Allingham (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: