Key result
Cardiac magnetic resonance-detected atrial fibrosis serves as a useful risk stratifier but is not an ideal electrophysiological endpoint for catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does MRI-guided fibrosis ablation reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation compared to conventional catheter ablation?
Does MRI-guided fibrosis ablation reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation compared to conventional catheter ablation?
This editorial comments on the DECAAF II trial, discussing the role of MRI-detected atrial fibrosis as a risk stratifier rather than an ideal ablation endpoint in persistent atrial fibrillation.
Comment on ‘Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial’ which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.8831. Atrial fibrillation is an increasingly prevalent arrhythmia associated with significant health burden. Its management improved in the last decades through the growing use of ablative techniques, mostly based on PVI. However, the rate of AF recurrence still remains a significant and challenging issue. In the current prevailing view, AF is believed to be induced by focal triggers arising from the PV in the majority of patients, and consequently an encircling ablation lesion around PV can successfully suppress AF.2 Although PVI remains the most commonly adopted strategy, the approach to ablation varies among centres, with the common goal of protecting the atrium from AF onset and recurrence. A recent...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narducci et al. (2022) conducted an editorial in Persistent atrial fibrillation. MRI-guided fibrosis ablation vs. Conventional catheter ablation was evaluated. Cardiac magnetic resonance-detected atrial fibrosis serves as a useful risk stratifier but is not an ideal electrophysiological endpoint for catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: