Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants are at least as effective and safe as vitamin K antagonists, but their widespread use presents specific challenges and limitations that must be addressed for optimal practice.
Why the study?
What are the challenges and limitations associated with the widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists?
What are the challenges and limitations associated with the widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists?
This review discusses the practical challenges and limitations of direct oral anticoagulants to guide their safe and effective clinical use.
Highlights need to address DOAC challenges in practice; leaves open optimal mitigation strategies across populations.
For many decades vitamin K antagonists (VKA), whilst extremely effective but associated with significant drawbacks, were the only drugs available for chronic anticoagulation. However, recently, novel direct oral anticoagulant drugs, completely different to VKA and at least as effective and safe as VKA, have been introduced in clinical practice and their use is becoming increasingly more widespread. Their availability can extend effective anticoagulant treatment to a larger number of subjects requiring anticoagulation and substantially improve the quality of life of many patients. However, these drugs and their use also have limitations. The aim of this article is to analyze these limitations and the challenges potentially associated with their use, a move crucial to promote proper, effective and safe use of the drugs in everyday practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palareti et al. (2015) conducted a review in Patients requiring chronic anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants are at least as effective and safe as vitamin K antagonists, but their widespread use presents specific challenges and limitations that must be addressed for optimal practice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: