Key result
The Frailty Risk Score combining nursing flowsheet data and blood biomarkers (FRS-NF-26-LABS) was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality (Adj. HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.28-1.33).
Why the study?
The study evaluated four definitions of an EHR-derived Frailty Risk Score incorporating nursing flowsheet data or ICD-10 codes and blood biomarkers for predicting in-hospital mortality.
Does a Frailty Risk Score derived from EHR data predict in-hospital mortality in adults ≥50 years admitted to medical-surgical units?
Observational (n=46,645)
Does a Frailty Risk Score derived from EHR data predict in-hospital mortality in adults ≥50 years admitted to medical-surgical units?
A Frailty Risk Score derived from EHR nursing flowsheet data and blood biomarkers accurately predicts in-hospital mortality in older adults.
May aid EHR-based frailty risk stratification in older inpatients; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate four definitions of a Frailty Risk Score (FRS) derived from EHR data that includes combinations of biopsychosocial risk factors using nursing flowsheet data or International Classification of Disease, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes and blood biomarkers and its predictive properties for in-hospital mortality in adults ≥50 years admitted to medical-surgical units. Methods In this retrospective observational study and secondary analysis of an EHR dataset, survival analysis and Cox regression models were performed with sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Integrated area under the ROC curve (iAUC) across follow-up time based on Cox modeling was estimated. Results The 46,645 patients averaged 1.5 hospitalizations (SD = 1.1) over the study period and 63.3% were emergent admissions. The average age was 70.4 years (SD = 11.4), 55.3% were female, 73.0% were non-Hispanic White (73.0%), mean comorbidity score was 3.9 (SD = 2.9), 80.5% were taking 1.5 high risk medications, and 42% recorded polypharmacy. The best performing FRS-NF-26-LABS included nursing flowsheet data and blood biomarkers (Adj. HR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.28, 1.33]), with good accuracy (iAUC = .794); the reduced model with age, sex, and FRS only demonstrated similar accuracy. The poorest performance was the ICD-10 code-based FRS. Conclusion The FRS captures information about the patient that increases risk for in-hospital mortality not accounted for by other factors. Identification of frailty enables providers to enhance various aspects of care, including increased monitoring, applying more intensive, individualized resources, and initiating more informed discussions about treatments and discharge planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lekan et al. (2021) conducted an observational in In-hospital mortality (n=46,645). Frailty Risk Score (FRS-NF-26-LABS) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (Adj. HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.28-1.33). The Frailty Risk Score combining nursing flowsheet data and blood biomarkers (FRS-NF-26-LABS) was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality (Adj. HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.28-1.33).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: