In this paper, we fuse EEG and forehead EOG to detect drivers' fatigue level by using discriminative graph regularized extreme learning machine (GELM). Twenty-one healthy subjects including twelve men and nine women participate in our driving simulation experiments. Two fusion strategies are adopted: feature level fusion (FLF) and decision level fusion (DLF). PERCLOS (the percentage of eye closure) is calculated by using the eye movement data recorded by eye tracking glasses as the indicator of drivers' fatigue level. The prediction correlation coefficient and root mean square error (RMSE) between the estimated fatigue level and the real fatigue level are both used to evaluate the performance of single modality and fusion modality. A comparative study on modality performance is conducted between GELM and support vector machine (SVM). The experimental results show that fusion modality can improve the performance of driving fatigue detection with a higher prediction correlation coefficient and a lower RMSE value in comparison with solely using EEG or forehead EOG. And FLF achieves better performance than DLF. GELM is more suitable for driving fatigue detection than SVM. Moreover, feature level fusion with GELM achieves the best performance with the prediction correlation coefficient of 0.8080 and the RMSE value of 0.0712 on average.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huo et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: