PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2003Global Change Biology165 citations

Exposure to an enriched CO2 atmosphere alters carbon assimilation and allocation in a pine forest ecosystem

View Full Paper
KSK. V. SchäferRORam OrenDEDavid S. Ellsworth

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract We linked a leaf‐level CO 2 assimilation model with a model that accounts for light attenuation in the canopy and measurements of sap‐flux‐based canopy conductance into a new canopy conductance‐constrained carbon assimilation (4C‐A) model. We estimated canopy CO 2 uptake ( A nC ) at the Duke Forest free‐air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) study. Rates of A nC estimated from the 4C‐A model agreed well with leaf gas exchange measurements ( A net ) in both CO 2 treatments. Under ambient conditions, monthly sums of net CO 2 uptake by the canopy ( A nC ) were 13% higher than estimates based on eddy‐covariance and chamber measurements. Annual estimates of A nC were only 3% higher than carbon (C) accumulations and losses estimated from ground‐based measurements for the entire stand. The C budget for the Pinus taeda component was well constrained (within 1% of ground‐based measurements). Although the closure of the C budget for the broadleaf species was poorer (within 20%), these species are a minor component of the forest. Under elevated CO 2 , the C used annually for growth, turnover, and respiration balanced only 80% of the A nC . Of the extra 700 g C m −2 a −1 (1999 and 2000 average), 86% is attributable to surface soil CO 2 efflux. This suggests that the production and turnover of fine roots was underestimated or that mycorrhizae and rhizodeposition became an increasingly important component of the C balance. Under elevated CO 2 , net ecosystem production increased by 272 g C m −2 a −1 : 44% greater than under ambient CO 2 . The majority (87%) of this C was sequestered in a moderately long‐term C pool in wood, with the remainder in the forest floor–soil subsystem.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schäfer et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a207cb0cd682a52c6f892d0https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00662.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fine root respiration in mature eastern white pine ( Pinus strobus ) in situ : the importance of CO2 in controlled environments1999 · 45 citations
  2. 2Soil CO2 evolution and root respiration in 11 year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations as affected by moisture and nutrient availability2000 · 111 citations
  3. 3The Dynamics of Foliage Distribution within a Forest Canopy1974 · 97 citations
  4. 4Modelling assimilation and intercellular CO2 from measured conductance: a synthesis of approaches2000 · 167 citations
  5. 5Reduction of forest floor respiration by fertilization on both carbon dioxide‐enriched and reference 17‐year‐old loblolly pine stands2003 · 131 citations