PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1979Law and Human Behavior167 citations

Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup.

View Full Paper
GWGary L. WellsMLMichael R. LeippeTOThomas M. Ostrom

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Issues regarding the fairness of lineups used for criminal identification are discussed in the context of a distinction between nominal size and functional size. Nominal size (the number of persons in the lineup) is less important for determining the fairness of a lineup than is functional size (the number of lineup members resembling the criminal). Functional size decreases to the extent that the nonsuspect members of the lineup are easily ruled out as not being suspected by the police. The extent to which the identification of the suspect can be considered an independently derived piece of incriminating evidence is positively related to functional size. Empirical estimates of functional size can be obtained through pictures of the corporal lineup from which mock witnesses make guesses of whom they believe the police suspect. A distinction is made between a functional size approach and hypothesis testing approaches. Uses of functional size notions in the court, by police, and in research are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wells et al. (1979) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a207e7615df8032213e88dchttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01039807
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper