Key result
Neural networks improve 90-day readmission prediction after peripheral vascular intervention to AUC ~0.76 vs logistic regression.
Why the study?
To determine whether neural network models based on electronic health record data can match and augment the performance of clinical registry models in predicting readmission after peripheral vascular intervention.
Do neural network models utilizing electronic health record data improve the prediction of 90-day readmission compared to logistic regression based on clinical registry data in patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention?
Cohort (n=2,348)
Yes
Do neural network models utilizing electronic health record data improve the prediction of 90-day readmission compared to logistic regression based on clinical registry data in patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.756% vs 0.71%
p-value: p=0.02
Neural network models leveraging direct electronic health record (EHR) data, particularly when combined with clinical registry data, improve predictive performance for 90-day readmission following peripheral vascular interventions compared to traditional logistic regression on registry data alone.
May enhance 90-day readmission prediction after PVI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Objectives: To determine whether neural network models based on electronic health record (EHR) data can match and augment the performance of models based on clinical registry data in predicting readmission after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Vascular Quality Initiative registry and INSIGHT Clinical Research Network EHR data from multiple academic institutions in New York City. Participants: Patients undergoing PVI during January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2021. Main outcome measures: Our outcome variable was 90-day readmission. We developed logistic regression (LR), multilevel perceptron (MLP), and recurrent neural network (RNN) models using registry alone, EHR data alone, and combined registry-EHR data. EHR data were evaluated using derived variables to match registry variables (EHR-derived data) and clinically meaningful code aggregation (EHR-direct data). Models were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) for discrimination, Spiegelhalter z score for calibration, and Brier score for overall performance. Results: The analytical cohort included 2348 patients undergoing PVI (mean age: 69.9±11.5 years). 832 (35%) patients were readmitted within 90 days. LR to predict 90-day readmission based on registry data alone had an AUC of 0.710, Spiegelhalter z score of 1.021, and Brier score of 0.211. MLP based on registry data alone had similar performance. MLP and RNN based on EHR-direct data (MLP: AUC=0.742, Spiegelhalter z=0.933, Brier=0.204; RNN: AUC=0.737, Spiegelhalter z=1.026, Brier=0.206) and registry+EHR-direct data (MLP: AUC=0.756, Spiegelhalter z=0.794, Brier=0.199; RNN: AUC=0.751, Spiegelhalter z=1.057, Brier=0.200) had improved performances. LR based on EHR-direct data and combined registry+EHR-direct data had worse performances. Conclusions: EHR data, when used with neural network models, can be useful to establish readmission predictive models or augment clinical registry data. EHR-based models can be potentially embedded in the clinical workflow, but model performance may be constrained by the absence of certain information in clinical encounters, such as social determinants of health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (n=2,348). Neural network models (MLP and RNN) using combined EHR and registry data vs. Logistic regression using clinical registry data alone was evaluated on Model discrimination (Area Under the Curve) for predicting 90-day readmission (p=0.02). Neural network models using combined EHR and registry data improved prediction of 90-day readmission after peripheral vascular intervention compared to logistic regression (AUC 0.756 vs 0.710, p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: