Key result
Integrating multiple neural classifiers significantly improved the performance of recognizing six types of arrhythmias and normal sinus rhythm compared to individual classifiers.
Why the study?
Does the integration of multiple neural classifiers improve the accuracy of heart beat recognition compared to individual classifiers?
Does the integration of multiple neural classifiers improve the accuracy of heart beat recognition compared to individual classifiers?
Integrating multiple neural classifiers improves the accuracy of automated heartbeat recognition from ECG waveforms compared to using a single best-trained network.
May enhance automated ECG arrhythmia detection in computational research; leaves open clinical validation and outcomes impact.
Purpose This paper presents new approach to the integration of neural classifiers. Typically only the best trained network is chosen, while the rest is discarded. However, combining the trained networks helps to integrate the knowledge acquired by the component classifiers and in this way improves the accuracy of the final classification. The aim of the research is to develop and compare the methods of combining neural classifiers of the heart beat recognition. Design/methodology/approach Two methods of integration of the results of individual classifiers are proposed. One is based on the statistical reliability of post‐processing performance on the trained data and the second uses the least mean square method in adjusting the weights of the weighted voting integrating network. Findings The experimental results of the recognition of six types of arrhythmias and normal sinus rhythm have shown that the performance of individual classifiers could be improved significantly by the integration proposed in this paper. Practical implications The presented application should be regarded as the first step in the direction of automatic recognition of the heart rhythms on the basis of the registered ECG waveforms. Originality/value The results mean that instead of designing one high performance classifier one can build a number of classifiers, each of not superb performance. The appropriate combination of them may produce a performance of much higher quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linh et al. (2005) studied Arrhythmias and normal sinus rhythm. Integration of multiple neural classifiers vs. Individual classifiers was evaluated on Recognition of six types of arrhythmias and normal sinus rhythm. Integrating multiple neural classifiers significantly improved the performance of recognizing six types of arrhythmias and normal sinus rhythm compared to individual classifiers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: