Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined the effect of neuropeptide Y Y(1)-receptor blockade both alone, and in interaction with alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonism, on basal hindlimb vascular conductance in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. Hindlimb vascular conductance was measured during infusion of BIBP3226 (Y(1)-receptor antagonist; 100 microg kg(-1)), prazosin (alpha(1)-receptor antagonist; 20 microg kg(-1)), and combined blockade. In males, vascular conductance increased 1.1 +/- 0.3 microl min(-1) mmHg(-1) above baseline with BIBP3226, and 2.4 +/- 0.4 microl min(-1) mmHg(-1) above baseline with prazosin (both P < 0.05). The increase in vascular conductance during combined blockade (5.1 +/- 0.7 microl min(-1) mmHg(-1)) was greater than the sum of the independent BIBP3226 and prazosin responses (P < 0.05). In females, basal hindlimb vascular conductance was unaffected by Y(1)-receptor blockade. However, alpha(1)-receptor blockade resulted in a 3.5 +/- 0.6 microl min(-1) mmHg(-1) increase in vascular conductance above baseline, which was not different than the combined blockade condition. Males had greater skeletal muscle neuropeptide Y concentration (P < 0.05; ELISA) than females. Furthermore, compared with females, male skeletal muscle contained greater Y(1)-receptor expression (P < 0.05; Western blot). It was concluded that, under baseline conditions, agonist and receptor-based mechanisms for Y(1)-receptor dependent control of vascular conductance in skeletal muscle was greater in male versus female rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jackson et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: