Key result
Natural menstruation is linked to lower cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity compared with oral contraceptive use.
Why the study?
The study evaluated cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity across the menstrual or pill cycle in naturally menstruating women and women using oral hormonal contraceptives.
Does natural menstruation compared with oral contraceptive use affect cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in young, healthy women?
Cross-Sectional (n=43)
Yes
Does natural menstruation compared with oral contraceptive use affect cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in young, healthy women?
Endogenous ovarian sex hormones and oral contraceptive use influence cardiovascular autonomic control, specifically cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity, in young women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not change practice in young women; leaves open whether cycle phase or OC use alters autonomic risk.
The present study evaluated cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) across the menstrual/pill cycle in naturally menstruating women (NAT women) and women using oral hormonal contraceptives (OCP women). In 21 NAT women (23 ± 4 years old) and 22 OCP women (23 ± 3 years old), cardiovagal BRS and circulating concentrations of estradiol and progesterone were evaluated during the lower hormone (early follicular/placebo pill) and higher hormone (late follicular to early luteal/active pill) phases. During the lower hormone phase, cardiovagal BRS up, down and mean gain were lower in NAT women (15.6 ± 8.3, 15.2 ± 6.1 and 15.1 ± 7.1 ms/mmHg) compared with OCP women (24.7 ± 9.4, 22.9 ± 8.0 and 23.0 ± 8.0 ms/mmHg) ( P = 0.003, P = 0.002 and P = 0.003, respectively), and higher oestrogen ( R 2 = 0.15, P = 0.024), but not progesterone ( R 2 = 0.06, P = 0.18), concentrations were predictive of lower BRS mean gain. During the higher hormone phase, higher progesterone concentrations were predictive of lower BRS mean gain ( R 2 = 0.12, P = 0.024). A multivariate regression model revealed group (NAT or OCP) to be a significant predictor of cardiovagal BRS mean gain in the lower hormone phase when hormone concentrations were adjusted for ( R 2 = 0.36, P = 0.0044). The multivariate regression model was not significant during the higher hormone phase ( P > 0.05). In summary, cardiovagal BRS is lower in NAT compared with OCP women during the lower hormone phase of the menstrual/pill cycle and might be associated with higher oestrogen concentrations. In contrast, during the higher hormone phase of the menstrual/OCP cycle, higher progesterone concentrations were predictive of lower cardiovagal BRS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mascone et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=43). Natural menstruation vs. Oral hormonal contraceptives was evaluated on Cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) mean gain during the lower hormone phase (p=0.003). Natural menstruation was associated with lower cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity mean gain (15.1 ± 7.1 ms/mmHg) compared to oral contraceptive use (23.0 ± 8.0 ms/mmHg) during the lower hormone phase (P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: