PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2022Cureus2 citationsOpen Access

Differences in Stroke or Systemic Thromboembolism Readmission Risk After Hospitalization for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter

HTHarshith ThyagaturuGeneral / Preventive / LipidsABAlexander BoltonEmory UniversitySTSittinun ThangjuiElectrophysiology

Key Result

Atrial flutter was associated with a significantly lower one-year risk of stroke or systemic thromboembolism readmission compared to atrial fibrillation (aHR 0.79).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=231,102)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does atrial flutter confer a lower risk of stroke or systemic thromboembolism readmission compared to atrial fibrillation in hospitalized adults?

P
Population
231,102 hospitalized adults with a primary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, followed for up to one year to assess readmission risk.
E
Exposure
Hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of Atrial Flutter (AFL)
C
Comparator
Hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
O
Outcome
Readmission for ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism (STE) within one yearhard clinical

Hospitalization for atrial flutter is associated with a 21% lower adjusted risk of 1-year readmission for stroke or systemic thromboembolism compared to atrial fibrillation, suggesting the thromboembolic risk profiles of these arrhythmias may differ.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.79 (95% CI 0.66–0.95)

Absolute Event Rate: 1.4% vs 2.1%

p-value: p=0.01

Limitations

  • Administrative codes are subject to misclassification bias from inaccurate entries or missing codes.
  • Data on medication use and adherence (e.g., anticoagulants, rate/rhythm control) were not available.
  • Findings may not be generalizable to a younger population since most patients were over 65 years old.
  • Maximum follow-up was limited to one year due to database constraints, potentially missing later events.
  • Did not exclude patients who underwent ablation procedures, which could lower stroke risk.
  • Potential for misattribution bias due to crossover between atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation groups.
  • Administrative data subject to misclassification bias from inaccurate entries or missing codes
  • Lack of medication use and adherence data, including specific types or doses of anticoagulants
  • Findings may not be generalizable to younger populations as most patients were >65 years old
  • Maximum follow-up limited to one year due to database constraints
  • Did not exclude patients who underwent ablation procedures

Abstract

Background Although atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are different arrhythmias, they are assumed to confer the same risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolism (STE) despite a lack of available evidence. In this study, we investigated the difference in the risk of stroke or STE after AF and AFL hospitalizations. Methodology The National Readmission Database (NRD) 2018 was used to identify AF and AFL patients using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes and were followed until the end of the calendar year to identify stroke or STE readmissions. Survival estimates were calculated, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) and compare the risk of stroke or STE readmissions between AF and AFL groups. Results A total of 215,810 AF and 15,292 AFL patients were identified. AFL patients were more likely to be younger (66 vs. 70 years), male (68% vs. 47%), and had higher prevalence of obesity (25% vs. 22%), obstructive sleep apnea (14% vs. 12%), diabetes mellitus (31% vs. 26%), and alcohol use (6.9% vs. 5.5%) (all p < 0.01). After adjusting for potential patient and hospital-level characteristics, there was a statistically significant decrease in one-year stroke or STE readmission risk in AFL patients compared to AF patients (aHR 0.79 (0.66-0.95); p = 0.01). Conclusions AFL patients are commonly younger males with a higher burden of medical comorbidity. There is a decrease in the one-year risk of stroke or STE events in AFL patients compared to AF. The predictors of stroke and STE are similar in both AFL and AF groups. Further studies with longer follow-up and anticoagulation data are needed to verify the results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thyagaturu et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (n=231,102). Atrial flutter vs. Atrial fibrillation was evaluated on One-year stroke or systemic thromboembolism readmission (aHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.95, p=0.01). Atrial flutter was associated with a significantly lower one-year risk of stroke or systemic thromboembolism readmission compared to atrial fibrillation (aHR 0.79).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2080d7c38d4935b3a5e2eahttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23844
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper