Key result
Incretin-based therapies did not increase the risk for major adverse cardiac events over up to 4 years compared with comparators, though liraglutide reduced MACE risk by 13% in one RCT.
Why the study?
Do incretin-based therapies (DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists) increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Systematic Review
Do incretin-based therapies (DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists) increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Incretin-based therapies (DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists) do not appear to increase the short-term risk of major adverse cardiac events in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Affirms cardiovascular safety of incretin-based therapies in type 2 diabetes; extends RCT evidence to 4 years of follow-up.
INTRODUCTION: Regulatory requirements mandate that new drugs for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, are evaluated to show that they do not increase cardiovascular (CV) risk. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the association between DPP-4 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist use and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The National Institutes of Health Medline database was searched for pooled analyses, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists that included CV endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles met the inclusion criteria encompassing 11 pooled analyses, 17 meta-analyses, and eight RCTs (including secondary analyses). Over the short term (up to 4 years), patients with T2DM exposed to a DPP-4 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist were not at increased risk for MACE (or its component endpoints) compared with those who received comparator agents. Two meta-analyses showed a significant reduction in the incidence of MACE associated with DPP-4 inhibitor therapy as a drug class, but this beneficial effect was not observed in other meta-analyses that included large RCT CV outcome studies. In four RCTs that evaluated alogliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, or lixisenatide, there was no overall increased risk for MACE relative to placebo in T2DM patients at high risk for CV events or with established CV disease, although there was an increased rate of hospitalization for heart failure associated with saxagliptin. A fifth RCT showed that liraglutide reduced MACE risk by 13% versus placebo. CONCLUSION: Overall, incretin therapy does not appear to increase risk for MACE in the short term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mannucci et al. (2016) conducted a systematic review in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists vs. Comparator agents or placebo was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Incretin-based therapies did not increase the risk for major adverse cardiac events over up to 4 years compared with comparators, though liraglutide reduced MACE risk by 13% in one RCT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: