PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2003Journal of Clinical Oncology303 citations

Enrollment of Older Patients in Cancer Treatment Trials in Canada: Why is Age a Barrier?

View Full Paper
KYKaren YeeJPJoseph L. PaterLPLam Pho

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the enrollment of older patients (>/= 65 years) in Canadian cancer treatment trials and compare accrual of older patients in Canada and the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the number of older patients enrolled in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) treatment trials between 1993 and 1996 was performed. These rates were compared with the corresponding rates in the general population of patients who were >/= 65 years old and had cancer, obtained from Statistics Canada, and those published by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) in the United States. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 1996, 4,174 patients were enrolled onto 69 NCIC CTG trials of 16 tumor types. Older patients accounted for 22% of trial enrollees, compared with 58% of the Canadian population with cancer. This discrepancy existed in all cancer types except for multiple myeloma. The percentages of older patients enrolled were also analyzed by study type: 15% in adjuvant trials, 25% in metastatic trials, 29% in investigational new drug trials, 24% in phase I trials, and 21% in supportive care trials. The overall proportion of older patients enrolled onto Canadian trials (22%) was slightly lower than that in SWOG trials (25%). CONCLUSION: Age remains a barrier for accrual onto cancer treatment trials, even when reimbursement is not an issue. Strategies to overcome this barrier, including the implementation of trials specifically tailored to patients aged >/= 65 years, are prudent in light of our aging population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yee et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2082d815df8032213e8fd5https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.12.044
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Selection factors in clinical trials: results from the Community Clinical Oncology Program Physician's Patient Log.1987 · 132 citations
  2. 2A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study1996 · 415 citations
  3. 3Aging and the respiratory system1996 · 133 citations
  4. 4Cancer Treatment and Age: Patient Perspectives1993 · 259 citations
  5. 5Cancer and comorbidity in older patients: A descriptive profile1996 · 216 citations