Key result
Unrealistic optimism, represented by lower perceived risk, was associated with greater carotid artery intima-media thickness (β = -.21, d = .46, p < .01).
Why the study?
Is unrealistic optimism about risk of heart disease associated with carotid artery intima-media thickness in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=148)
No
Is unrealistic optimism about risk of heart disease associated with carotid artery intima-media thickness in adults?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.46
p-value: p=< .01
Unrealistic optimism about heart disease risk is associated with increased carotid artery intima-media thickness, a subclinical marker of atherosclerosis.
Hypothesis-generating for unrealistic optimism as atherosclerosis risk marker; prospective studies needed before clinical consideration.
OBJECTIVE: Unrealistic optimism-typically conceptualized as underestimation of comparative risk-has been previously associated with poorer health behaviors and outcomes, but no research to date has examined the association between unrealistic optimism and subclinical or clinical disease endpoints. Here, cross-sectional data from one time point in the Pittsburgh Healthy Heart study are used to examine whether unrealistic optimism about risk of heart disease is associated with carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT), a subclinical marker of atherosclerosis. METHODS: Participants were 148 adults aged 57-77. Objective risk score was calculated using the Framingham calculator, and IMT was regressed on risk score and perceived risk. Controlling for the Framingham risk score effectively equated risk across the sample, meaning that lower risk perceptions represented unrealistic optimism. RESULTS: When controlling for the risk score, risk perceptions were negatively associated with IMT (β = -.21, p < .01, t = -2.79, d = .46), a finding that was not moderated by gender. The risk score was also associated with IMT (β = .42, p < .001, t = 5.55, d = .91). CONCLUSIONS: Unrealistic optimism was associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. Future longitudinal research is necessary to evaluate the temporal sequence as well as to examine putative explanatory mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrer et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical atherosclerosis (n=148). Unrealistic optimism (lower perceived risk) vs. Realistic or pessimistic risk perceptions was evaluated on Carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) (β = -.21, d = .46, p=< .01). Unrealistic optimism, represented by lower perceived risk, was associated with greater carotid artery intima-media thickness (β = -.21, d = .46, p < .01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: