Key result
Active cancer in ischemic stroke patients was associated with higher CRP and D-dimer, more frequent cryptogenic stroke, and multiple DWI lesions compared to non-cancer stroke patients.
Why the study?
Do the characteristics, mechanisms, and imaging patterns of ischemic stroke differ between patients with active cancer, inactive cancer, and those without cancer?
Case-Control (n=612)
Do the characteristics, mechanisms, and imaging patterns of ischemic stroke differ between patients with active cancer, inactive cancer, and those without cancer?
Ischemic stroke in patients with active cancer is distinct from usual strokes, characterized by higher inflammation, coagulation markers, and multiple DWI lesions, suggesting different pathogenic mechanisms.
Supports distinct stroke evaluation in active cancer; leaves open optimal management strategies pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether the characteristics of ischemic stroke in patients with cancer (ISC) differ from usual ischemic strokes (non-ISC). Although a small number of studies have been conducted to characterize ISC, the status of cancer has rarely been considered seriously. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the features of ISC according to the status of cancer, and compare their characteristics with those of non-ISC. METHODS: We assessed and classified 204 ISC patients into two groups: 104 with active (ISC-active) and 100 with inactive (ISC-inactive) cancer. For each ISC patient, two age- and gender-matched ischemic stroke patients without history of cancer were selected as non-ISC control subjects. We compared the clinical/laboratory data, stroke mechanisms, and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) lesion patterns between ISC-active and non-ISC patients, and between ISC-inactive and non-ISC patients. RESULTS: ISC-active patients demonstrated higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer, more frequent cryptogenic stroke and patterns of multiple DWI lesions (in bilateral anterior or in anterior and posterior circulations), and less prevalent conventional risk factors than non-ISC patients, while ISC-inactive patients revealed no such marked differences. Among ISC-active patients, both elevated CRP and D-dimer levels were associated with cryptogenic mechanism and multiple lesion patterns. Furthermore, ISC-active patients with cryptogenic strokes tended to have multiple lesion patterns and metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: ISC-active, but not ISC-inactive, is distinct in terms of risk factors, stroke mechanisms, and lesion patterns. Chronic inflammation and an activated coagulation system may contribute to the pathogenic mechanism of strokes, the extent of each depending on the activity and severity of cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2013) conducted a case-control in Ischemic stroke (n=612). Active cancer vs. Inactive cancer and no cancer was evaluated on Clinical/laboratory data, stroke mechanisms, and DWI lesion patterns. Active cancer in ischemic stroke patients was associated with higher CRP and D-dimer, more frequent cryptogenic stroke, and multiple DWI lesions compared to non-cancer stroke patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: