Key result
Physical exercise during training and competition increased the 0V pattern and decreased the 2LV pattern of heart-rate variability from rest to post-exercise, with opposite trends during recovery.
Why the study?
Assessing cardiac autonomic regulation via heart-rate variability during exercise is challenging due to RR-interval non-stationarity, which prevents computation of classical time- and frequency-domain parameters.
Does symbolic analysis of short-epoch RR intervals characterize heart-rate variability during physical exercise in short-distance runners?
Observational (n=8)
Does symbolic analysis of short-epoch RR intervals characterize heart-rate variability during physical exercise in short-distance runners?
Symbolic analysis of short 30-second ECG epochs can effectively characterize heart-rate variability and autonomic regulation during physical exercise.
Symbolic analysis of short-epoch HRV may track autonomic shifts in runners; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
During physical exercise, the assessment of cardiac autonomic regulation through the analysis of heart-rate variability is difficult due to non-stationarity of RR intervals. The short duration of stationary epoch of RR-interval series makes not possible the computation of classical time-and frequency-domain parameters. Symbolic analysis can deal with short epoch of RR interval; thus, this study aims to apply symbolic analysis to analyze heart-rate variability of short-distance runners during training and competition. Data consists of RR-intervals extracted from 30s-long electrocardiograms acquired by KardiaMobile of Alivecor in 8 short-distance runners (1/7 M/F, 17[16;20] years) during training and competition. Symbolic analysis classifies a reduced number (in this study, three) of consecutive RR intervals in four patterns according to the sign and number of variations: no variation (0V); one variation (1V); two like variations (2LV); two unlike variations (2UV). An increase in low amount of variations (0V or 1V patterns) is usually linked with increased sympathetic control and vagal withdrawal, while an increase in high amount of variations (2LV and 2UV patterns) is usually linked with sympathetic withdrawal and increased vagal control. In our results, pattern 0V /2LV increases/decreases from rest to post exercise and decreases/increases during recovery, in both training and competition. Thus, our results confirm the opposite trends between low and high variations of symbolic patterns. In conclusion, symbolic analysis seems to be an efficient tool to characterize heart-rate variability during physical exercise at different level of psychophysical stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romagnoli et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Short-distance runners (n=8). Physical exercise (training and competition) vs. Rest and recovery periods was evaluated on Heart-rate variability symbolic patterns (0V, 1V, 2LV, 2UV). Physical exercise during training and competition increased the 0V pattern and decreased the 2LV pattern of heart-rate variability from rest to post-exercise, with opposite trends during recovery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: