The addition reaction of the hydroxyl radical to imidazole and subsequent elimination of water to form the 1-dehydroimidazolyl radical is investigated using MP2 and B3LYP methods, including large basis sets and SCI-PCM modeling of solvent effects. It is found that the barrier to addition of the hydroxyl radical at the 5-position is energetically favored over addition to the 2- or 4-positions by 2−3 kcal/mol at the SCI-PCM/MP2/6-311G(2df,p)//MP2/6-31G(d,p) level, whereas the corresponding B3LYP calculations yield a barrier-free addition at the 5-position. The lower barrier and NBO analysis explain the experimentally observed specificity for the 5-hydroxylation of imidazole and histidine, albeit the 2-adduct is about 4 kcal/mol more stable than the 5-adduct. The NBO energetic analysis shows that the exoanomeric effect stabilizes the transition state at the 5-position about 0.3 kcal/mol more than that at the 2-position. Moreover, the π-interaction between the attacking nonbonding spin orbital of the hydroxyl radical and the π-cloud of imidazole is the least for the transition state at the 5-position, favoring the σC5-O bond formation. The 5-hydroxyimidazolyl radical undergoes a slow elimination of water (the added OH group and the hydrogen at the N1 position) to yield the 1-dehydroimidazolyl radical. The base-catalyzed dehydration profile was modeled in two steps at the B3LYP/6-311G(2df,p)//6-31G(d,p) level. The PES for the dehydration reaction seems rather flat. The first step is a barrier-free loss of the proton at N1 induced by the hydroxide ion to yield the 1-dehydro-5-hydroxyimidazolyl radical anion. In the second step, the hydroxide ion is regenerated from the intermediate to yield the final product with a barrier of 2.7 kcal/mol. The calculated hyperfine structures in the presence of the continuum solvent model for the 5-hydroxyimidazolyl and 1-dehydroimidazolyl radicals are in close agreement with the experimental ones recorded in aqueous solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Llano et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: