PURPOSE: To report an ex vivo study on the local effects of hydrodynamic thrombectomy for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (off-label use). METHODS: Three devices (6-F AngioJet Xpeedior and 6-F and 8-F Oasis) were used for hydrodynamic thrombectomy inside the arteries of 24 inflated and perfused porcine lung explants. Each system was used at multiple positions inside 4 intact and 4 embolized lungs in vessels measuring 2 to 4 mm, 4 to 6 mm, 6 to 8 mm, and 8 to 10 mm. Angiograms prior to, during, and after catheter positioning and system operation were used to detect arterial wall trauma and to measure local clot removal per 30-second cycle. A total of 21 vessel wall samples were subjected to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate non-perforating lesions. RESULTS: All systems were able to remove clot material. The average recanalized vessel length normalized to 30 seconds for vessel diameters of 2 to 4 and 8 to 10 mm, respectively, was 1.17 and 1.75 cm (AngioJet), 0.97 and 0.25 cm (6-F Oasis), and 2.2 and 1.05 cm (8-F Oasis). Perforations occurred during positioning of the 6-F Oasis (4/78 maneuvers) and 8-F Oasis (13/60), but not the AngioJet (0/89); perforations were also seen during system operation (AngioJet: 21/89 activations, 6-F Oasis: 4/78, and 8-F Oasis: 9/60; all lesions inside vessels <6 mm in diameter). SEM showed 35 lesions, 14 with perforation (contrast extravasation) and 21 without perforation (induced by the tip of the guidewire). CONCLUSION: The AngioJet was most efficient in clot removal, followed by the 8-F Oasis. The 6-F Oasis was least efficient, but had fewest complications. According to these experiments, the tested hydrodynamic thrombectomy devices may cause perforations in vessels <6 mm in diameter. Changes in catheter design to reduce system-specific complication rates or to improve the efficacy of clot removal are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biederer et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: