Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The high repair cost of <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex Notation="TeX">$(n,k)$</tex></formula> Maximum Distance Separable (MDS) erasure codes has recently motivated a new class of MDS codes, called Repair MDS codes, that can significantly reduce repair bandwidth over conventional MDS codes. In this paper, we describe <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$(n,k,d)$</tex></formula> Exact-Repair MDS codes, which allow for any failed node to be repaired exactly with access to <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">d</tex> </formula> survivor nodes, where <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">k≤ d≤ n-1</tex></formula> . We construct Exact-Repair MDS codes that are optimal in repair bandwidth for the cases of: <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex Notation="TeX">(a)~k/n≤ 1/2</tex></formula> and <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">d≥ 2k-1</tex></formula> <footnoteref refid="fn1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/> <footnote asterisk="no" id="fn1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><footnotepara>In this paper, we assume that all of the survivor systematic nodes participate in the repair.</footnotepara></footnote> ; <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">(b)~k≤ 3</tex></formula> . Our codes are deterministic and require a finite-field size of at most <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex Notation="TeX">$2(n-k)$</tex></formula> . Our constructive codes are based on interference alignment techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suh et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: