Key result
A multichannel rPPG-based blood pressure estimator using InfoGAN for synthetic data generation achieved a mean absolute error of 6.72 mmHg for MAP and 5.95 mmHg for DBP.
Why the study?
Contactless blood pressure measurement via remote photoplethysmography faces challenges because rPPG waveforms differ from PPG signals, and deep learning approaches are hindered by data scarcity.
Does a multichannel rPPG-based blood pressure estimator with synthetic data generation improve the accuracy of contactless blood pressure measurement compared to state-of-the-art methods?
Does a multichannel rPPG-based blood pressure estimator with synthetic data generation improve the accuracy of contactless blood pressure measurement compared to state-of-the-art methods?
A novel rPPG-based blood pressure estimator using GAN-generated synthetic data demonstrates improved accuracy for contactless blood pressure measurement.
May enable contactless BP monitoring; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective clinical validation before adoption.
Deriving blood pressure in a non-invasive way via photoplethysmography (PPG) signals has become a familiar topic. With the knowledge of the relation between PPG and blood pressure, we expect to further make the measurement contactless for convenience reasons. An alternative signal source is remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) signals. There are mainly two kinds of approaches for exploiting blood pressure through PPG signals, one is by calculating the pulse transit time of the arterial pulse wave at two consecutive sites and the other is based on waveform feature analysis from a single signal. The calibration procedure is necessary for the former way, which leads to some limitations in general use. On the other hand, the properties of the rPPG waveform are far from PPG signals. Hence, the known waveform features in PPG signals are hard to be leveraged in the case of rPPG signals. Recently, convolutional neural networks are also applied for solving this problem. However, the lack of data is an obstacle to the training procedure and evaluation. In this study, a multichannel rPPG-based blood pressure estimator is proposed. To ease the data scarcity issue, the generative adversarial network is adopted to augment synthetic waveform data. Besides, as we know that some physiological states like age and BMI are dominant factors in blood pressure. InfoGAN is chosen in this work to generate the synthetic data with the blood pressure value fluctuating correspondingly to the controlled age and BMI combination. The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on MIMIC III and Cuffless datasets. With the synthetic data generation, the mean absolute error (MAE) is reduced to 6.72 and 5.95 mmHg in MAP and DBP respectively. The standard deviations of the MAEs are also reduced. In the rPPG case, the MAE of SBP is 9.13 and 8.76 mmHg for DBP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2022) studied Blood pressure measurement. Multichannel rPPG-based blood pressure estimator with InfoGAN synthetic data generation vs. State-of-the-art methods was evaluated on Mean absolute error (MAE) in MAP and DBP. A multichannel rPPG-based blood pressure estimator using InfoGAN for synthetic data generation achieved a mean absolute error of 6.72 mmHg for MAP and 5.95 mmHg for DBP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: