Key result
Neither DCA infusion nor hyperoxia altered the reliance on substrate phosphorylation during 90 seconds of high-intensity aerobic exercise compared to control.
Why the study?
Does hyperoxic breathing or dichloroacetate (DCA) infusion reduce the reliance on substrate phosphorylation at the onset of high-intensity aerobic exercise in aerobically trained males?
RCT (n=8)
Randomized conditions
Does hyperoxic breathing or dichloroacetate (DCA) infusion reduce the reliance on substrate phosphorylation at the onset of high-intensity aerobic exercise in aerobically trained males?
Neither hyperoxia nor increased oxidative substrate supply via DCA infusion limits the rate of oxidative phosphorylation at the onset of intense aerobic exercise in trained subjects.
Hyperoxia and DCA do not reduce substrate phosphorylation reliance at exercise onset; challenges assumptions of O2 or substrate limitation in trained athletes.
This study investigated whether hyperoxic breathing (100% O(2)) or increasing oxidative substrate supply [dichloroacetate (DCA) infusion] would increase oxidative phosphorylation and reduce the reliance on substrate phosphorylation at the onset of high-intensity aerobic exercise. Eight male subjects cycled at 90% maximal O(2) uptake (VO(2 max)) for 90 s in three randomized conditions: 1) normoxic breathing and saline infusion over 1 h immediately before exercise (CON), 2) normoxic breathing and saline infusion with DCA (100 mg/kg body wt), and 3) hyperoxic breathing for 20 min at rest and during exercise and saline infusion (HYP). Muscle biopsies from the vastus lateralis were sampled at rest and after 30 and 90 s of exercise. DCA infusion increased pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activation above CON and HYP (3.10 +/- 0.23, 0.56 +/- 0.08, 0.69 +/- 0.05 mmol x kg wet muscle(-1) x min(-1), respectively) and significantly increased both acetyl-CoA and acetylcarnitine (11.0 +/- 0.7, 2.0 +/- 0.5, 2.2 +/- 0.5 mmol/kg dry muscle, respectively) at rest. However, DCA and HYP did not alter phosphocreatine degradation and lactate accumulation and, therefore, the reliance on substrate phosphorylation during 30 s (CON, 51.2 +/- 5.4; DCA, 56.5 +/- 7.1; HYP, 69.5 +/- 6.3 mmol ATP/kg dry muscle) and 90 s of exercise (CON, 90.6 +/- 9.5; DCA, 107.2 +/- 13.0; HYP, 101.2 +/- 15.2 mmol ATP/kg dry muscle). These data suggest that the rate of oxidative phosphorylation at the onset of exercise at 90% VO(2 max) is not limited by oxygen availability to the active muscle or by substrate availability (metabolic inertia) at the level of PDH in aerobically trained subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savasi et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in High-intensity aerobic exercise (n=8). Dichloroacetate (DCA) infusion or hyperoxic breathing vs. Normoxic breathing and saline infusion was evaluated on Reliance on substrate phosphorylation during 90 s of exercise (mmol ATP/kg dry muscle). Neither DCA infusion nor hyperoxia altered the reliance on substrate phosphorylation during 90 seconds of high-intensity aerobic exercise compared to control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: