Key result
A low preprocedural ventricular rate during AF independently predicted sick sinus syndrome requiring a pacemaker after ablation (OR 0.90 per 1 beat/min increase, P=0.04).
Why the study?
Does a low preprocedural ventricular rate predict the development of sick sinus syndrome after ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=102)
Does a low preprocedural ventricular rate predict the development of sick sinus syndrome after ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation?
Odds Ratio: 0.9
p-value: p=0.04
A low preprocedural ventricular rate in patients with long-standing persistent AF off antiarrhythmic drugs predicts the unmasking of sick sinus syndrome requiring pacemaker implantation after successful ablation.
May inform pre-ablation SSS risk counseling in persistent AF; leaves open prospective validation before guiding practice.
BACKGROUND: Concealed sick sinus syndrome may become manifest after restoration of sinus rhythm by ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the preprocedural ventricular rate during AF and sinus node function in patients with long-standing persistent AF. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 102) who underwent ablation for long-standing persistent AF were enrolled. We measured the ventricular rate during AF before ablation in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs. Sinus node function was assessed by electrophysiological study and serial Holter recordings after ablation. RESULTS: Patients in the lowest quartile of ventricular rate during AF had longer corrected sinus node recovery time (1.06 ± 1.39 seconds) than those in the other quartiles (0.54 ± 0.31 seconds; P = 0.006) and lower mean heart rate on 24-hour Holter recording 3 months after ablation (68 ± 9 beats/min vs 75 ± 10 beats/min, P = 0.01). During a mean follow-up of 23 ± 10 months, sick sinus syndrome necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation developed in five (5%) patients, and multivariate analysis revealed that a low ventricular rate during AF rate was an independent risk factor for sick sinus syndrome (odds ratio = 0.90 for a 1 beat/min increase in AF rate, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A low preprocedural ventricular rate during AF indicates the existence of sinus node dysfunction after restoration of sinus rhythm by ablation in patients with long-standing persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masuda et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (n=102). Low preprocedural ventricular rate during AF vs. Higher preprocedural ventricular rate was evaluated on Sick sinus syndrome necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation (OR 0.90, p=0.04). A low preprocedural ventricular rate during AF independently predicted sick sinus syndrome requiring a pacemaker after ablation (OR 0.90 per 1 beat/min increase, P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: