PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 2, 2003International Journal of Educational Management251 citationsOpen Access

Developing alternative perspectives for quality in higher education

View Full Paper
GSGitachari SrikanthanJDJohn Dalrymple

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Suggests the quality in higher education (HE) debate is currently narrowly focussed, essentially around adapting industrial quality systems. Traditionally, the notion of academic freedom was seen as the requirement of excellence in education. In more recent times (pre 1990) measures of quality control were imposed on HE, but their adoption was superficial compared to industry. The post 1990 period saw the need for a considerable increase in the quality systems activity in HE, in view of the dynamism in the sector. The adoption of quality management (QM) was preferred, because of its extensive practice in industry. Presently, its practice in HE is deteriorating into managerialism in institutions, because of lack of development of a shared vision and lack of a match between QM techniques and educational processes. Proposes a new approach to quality systems in HE. QM can still be the broad management methodology but should be adapted to educational processes and be made to preserve the traditional values of academic freedom and collegial modes of operation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Srikanthan et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20885ea25331481ccd4b79https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540310467804
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper