Key result
Factor analysis of the PSDRS in post-stroke depression identified three factors (Depressive/Anxious Symptoms, Lack of Emotional Control, Reduced Motivation) accounting for 63.4% of total variance.
Cross-Sectional (n=98)
The Post-Stroke Depression Rating Scale identifies three core dimensions of post-stroke depression that correlate differently with premorbid history, functional status, and age.
Supports differentiated PSDRS assessment in post-stroke depression; leaves open outcome prediction and treatment implications.
Objectives: To investigate the principal psychopathological dimensions of post-stroke depression (PSD) through the assessment of the factorial structure of the Post-Stroke Depression Rating Scale (PSDRS).Methods: We enrolled ninety-eight subjects with PSD, who underwent the PSDRS, MMSE and Barthel Index. Information about demographic, clinical, and neuroanatomical factors was collected.Results: The factor analysis extracted three factors accounting for 63.4% of the total variance, and identified as: (1) “Depressive and Anxious Symptoms“ (DAS); (2) “Lack of Emotional Control” (LEC); 3) “Reduced Motivation” (RM). On multivariate statistics, DAS severity was predicted by previous history of mood disorders and Barthel Index; LEC severity was predicted by Barthel Index; RM severity was predicted by age.Conclusions: The PSDRS displayed a reliable factor structure that agreed with previous interpretation of PSD. In particular, core depressive symptoms seem to be related to premorbid personality and functional status, whereas apathy/anhedonia may be connected to brain aging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quaranta et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Post-stroke depression (n=98). Demographic, clinical, and neuroanatomical factors was evaluated on Principal psychopathological dimensions of post-stroke depression (factorial structure of PSDRS). Factor analysis of the PSDRS in post-stroke depression identified three factors (Depressive/Anxious Symptoms, Lack of Emotional Control, Reduced Motivation) accounting for 63.4% of total variance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: