Key result
Sample entropy analysis achieved significantly shorter average latency or error in detecting muscle activity onset compared to conventional methods (p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Does a sample entropy (SampEn) analysis based method improve muscle activity onset detection compared to conventional methods in surface EMG signals contaminated by ECG artifacts?
Does a sample entropy (SampEn) analysis based method improve muscle activity onset detection compared to conventional methods in surface EMG signals contaminated by ECG artifacts?
A novel sample entropy-based method improves muscle onset detection in surface EMG signals contaminated by ECG artifacts without requiring artifact removal.
May aid EMG onset detection amid ECG interference; extends prior techniques yet requires validation before clinical use.
Surface electromyography (EMG) signal from trunk muscles is often contaminated by electrocardiography (ECG) artifacts. This study presents a novel method for muscle activity onset detection by processing surface EMG against ECG artifacts. The method does not require removal of ECG artifacts from raw surface EMG signals. Instead, it applies the sample entropy (SampEn) analysis to highlight EMG activity and suppress ECG artifacts in the signal complexity domain. A SampEn threshold can then be determined for detection of muscle activity. The performance of the proposed method was examined with different SampEn analysis window lengths, using a series of combinations of 'clean' experimental EMG and ECG recordings over a wide range of signal to noise ratios (SNRs) from -10 to 10 dB. For all the examined SNRs, the window length of 128 ms yielded the best performance among all the tested lengths. Compared with the conventional amplitude thresholding and integrated profile methods, the SampEn analysis based method achieved significantly better performance, demonstrated as the shortest average latency or error among the three methods (p < 0.001 for any of the examined SNRs except 10 dB).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2013) studied EMG signal processing. Sample entropy (SampEn) analysis vs. Conventional amplitude thresholding and integrated profile methods was evaluated on Average latency or error in muscle activity onset detection (p=<0.001). Sample entropy analysis achieved significantly shorter average latency or error in detecting muscle activity onset compared to conventional methods (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: