Key result
Telehealth interventions for chronic cardiovascular conditions and COPD lack sufficient US-based cost-effectiveness research, with 27 reviewed articles highlighting methodological challenges.
Why the study?
Conclusive research is needed to determine whether telehealth interventions are cost-effective for individuals living with chronic cardiovascular conditions and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Are telehealth interventions cost-effective for patients with chronic cardiovascular conditions and COPD?
Systematic Review (n=27)
Are telehealth interventions cost-effective for patients with chronic cardiovascular conditions and COPD?
There is a significant gap in US-based research regarding the cost-effectiveness of telehealth interventions for chronic cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases.
Lack of US cost-effectiveness data limits telehealth recommendations in chronic CV and COPD care; leaves open the need for methodologically robust trials.
INTRODUCTION: The United States has seen a dramatic increase in the incidence of chronic disease, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic cardiovascular diseases. Telehealth interventions can potentially improve healthcare access and health outcomes in the United States while saving time and economic resources. Conclusive research is needed to show whether telehealth interventions are cost-effective for people living with chronic disease. AIM: This paper synthesizes the existing literature on the cost-effectiveness of telehealth interventions for patients with chronic cardiovascular conditions (congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarctions, and coronary heart disease) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A literature search was undertaken to identify studies that assessed the cost-effectiveness of telehealth interventions for chronic cardiovascular diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using PubMed and Scopus. RESULTS: A thorough literature search using PubMed and Scopus identified 753 articles that fit the search criteria. Of these, 27 articles met inclusion criteria, including 9 literature reviews and 1 meta-analysis. Over 80% of the relevant research was conducted in Europe, Taiwan, and Australia. The combination of a lack of cost-effectiveness research conducted in the United States, methodological challenges in the existing studies, and continued technological advancements, make it clear that further research is needed to make reliable inferences and conclusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trishna Kini (2022) conducted a systematic review in Chronic cardiovascular conditions and COPD (n=27). Telehealth interventions was evaluated on Cost-effectiveness. Telehealth interventions for chronic cardiovascular conditions and COPD lack sufficient US-based cost-effectiveness research, with 27 reviewed articles highlighting methodological challenges.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: