Comparative Evaluations of Selected Tracking-by-Detection Approaches

In this paper, we present a comparative evaluation of various multi-person tracking-by-detection approaches on public data sets. This paper investigates five popular trackers coupled with six relevant visual people detectors evaluated on seven public data sets. The evaluation emphasizes on exhibited performance variation depending on tracker-detector choices. Our experimental results show that the overall performance depends on how challenging the data set is, the performance of the detector on the specific data set, and the tracker-detector combination. Some trackers are more sensitive to the choice of a detector and some detectors to the choice of a tracker than others. Based on our results, two of the trackers demonstrate the best performances consistently across different data sets, whereas the best performing detectors vary per data set. This underscores the need for careful application context specific evaluation when choosing a detector.