Key result
SAECG detects late potentials in ~59% of ARVD patients, predominantly in severe disease.
Why the study?
Does signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) detect late potentials in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD)?
Systematic Review (n=975)
Does signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) detect late potentials in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD)?
Absolute Event Rate: 59% vs 5%
SAECG is a useful noninvasive tool that identifies late potentials in a majority of ARVD patients, correlating with disease severity and the presence of ventricular arrhythmias.
May support SAECG for noninvasive ARVD detection; extends evidence linking late potentials to severity and sustained VT.
BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is characterized by progressive replacement of RV myocardium with fibro-adipose tissue thought to be responsible for the presence of late potentials (LP) detected by SAECG. The general consensus on the role of SAECG in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with ARVD is lacking. The purpose of this systematic review was to better define the role of SAECG in ARVD. METHODS: An extensive review of literature was done to specifically describe the prevalence of LP in ARVD and its determinants, explore the various options available to improve the diagnostic ability of SAECG, and provide recommendations for proper utilization of this technique. RESULTS: LPs are frequent in ARVD (47-100%), and more prevalent in severe disease and in patients with documented spontaneous VT. SAECG is a useful test in following the characteristic evolutivity of the disease. 4-16% of normal family members of patients with ARVD also have abnormal SAECG results. Detection of LP in ARVD can be improved by employing a high-pass filter of 25 Hz and specifically looking for changes in the Z leads. CONCLUSIONS: SAECG testing should be considered a standard part of the evaluation of patients with known or suspected ARVD. Further research is needed to confirm the value of SAECG testing in predicting arrhythmia risk and assessing the rate of disease progression, as well as to determine if greater prevalence of SAECG abnormalities in family members of patients with ARVD represents early detection of ARVD. The ongoing multidisciplinary study of right ventricular dysplasia will hopefully answer some of these questions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasir et al. (2003) conducted a systematic review in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD) (n=975). Signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) vs. Healthy controls and normal family members was evaluated on Prevalence of late potentials (LP). SAECG detected late potentials in 59% of ARVD patients compared to 5% of controls, with a higher prevalence in patients with severe disease and documented sustained ventricular tachycardia.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: