This article places urban industrial reform in China in its broad historical context. The reform initiatives to date are a direct reaction to shortcomings of planning. While decentralization and increased reliance on markets and short-range managerial decisionmaking are more commonly noted in discussions about change in China, interpretation of current reforms should emphasize centralization of certain long-range aspects of the planning process, such as investment and basic price structure. Events prior to and following Tiananmen Square become more meaningful within this broader perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roger F. Riefler (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: