Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effects of a peer-previewing system on the oral reading skills of three LD students were examined using a multiple-baseline design across subjects. Results indicated that peer-previewing led to a marked decrease in the oral reading errors of all subjects. Reasons for the effectiveness of the procedure as well as its advantages are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salend et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: