Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A study was conducted to examine patient performance of certain safety measures in relation to 'attitude' and glycaemic control. One hundred and thirty consecutive routinely attending insulin-dependent diabetic patients (IDDM) were asked to show a source of sugar and diabetes identification (ID). An attitude scale, developed and psychometrically evaluated with intent to examine 'general attitude to diabetes', was used to study attitudes. Fifty-eight per cent of the IDDM patient sample carried both sugar and ID. The mean HbA1c of these patients (8.4%) was 2% lower (p less than 0.01) compared with patients carrying either ID only (24% of sample: mean HbA1c 10.4%), sugar only (6% of sample: mean HbA1c 10.3%) or neither item (12% of sample: mean HbA1c 10.7%). The general attitude score in these patients was significantly higher if sugar was carried (p less than 0.02) but there was no relationship with HbA1c (p greater than 0.1). A seven-item subcluster representing attitudes to diabetic management was more strongly related to sugar carriage (p less than 0.001) and was inversely correlated with HBA1c (r = 0.252: p less than 0.02). These findings indicate that attitudes to diabetes management may influence specific behavioural elements (i.e. compliance with advice always to carry sugar and ID). However, there was also a significant trend to higher carriage rates for sugar with a higher frequency of perceived hypoglycaemia (p less than 0.05) but no relationship between perceived hypoglycaemia and HbA1c. Absence of sugar of ID appears to represent a useful indicator of poor diabetic control and may assist in the definition of relevant attitudinal differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lockington et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: