Alternative power system architectures and interface technologies for driving high energy pulsed loads from the propulsion equipment of surface combatants are compared. Gas turbine mechanical and gas turbine Integrated Electric Drive (IED) propulsion trains are considered as prime power sources. Focus is on the energy path between the ship's prime power and the pulsed load, comparing system candidates on a size, weight and component cost basis. A capacitor based Pulse Forming Network (PFN) supplying an Electro‐Thermal (ET) Gun is utilized as the common load for all configurations. Results indicate that dedicated auxiliary generators driven from propulsion gas turbine engines is the preferred method of powering electric gun PFNs from ship drivetrain equipment. Auxiliary generator‐based systems are compact and lightweight over a wide power range, are equally attractive with both electric and mechanical drive trains and demonstrate retrofit potential to the current fleet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doyle et al. (1992) studied this question.