Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a general approach to the design, docking, and virtual screening of multiple combinatorial libraries against a family of proteins. The method consists of three main stages: docking the scaffold, selecting the best substituents at each site of diversity, and comparing the resultant molecules within and between the libraries. The core "divide-and-conquer" algorithm for side-chain selection, developed from an earlier version (Sun et al., J Comp Aided Mol Design 1998;12:597-604), provides a way to explore large lists of substituents with linear rather than combinatorial time dependence. We have applied our method to three combinatorial libraries and three serine proteases: trypsin, chymotrypsin, and elastase. We show that the scaffold docking procedure, in conjunction with a novel vector-based orientation filter, reproduces crystallographic binding modes. In addition, the free-energy-based scoring procedure (Zou et al., J Am Chem Soc 1999;121:8033-8043) is able to reproduce experimental binding data for P1 mutants of macromolecular protease inhibitors. Finally, we show that our method discriminates between a peptide library and virtual libraries built on benzodiazepine and tetrahydroisoquinolinone scaffolds. Implications of the docking results for library design are explored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamb et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: