Introduction This study tests an integrated UTAUT2–TAM framework for faculty adoption of AI-assisted teaching tools at Shanghai University. Methods A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design combined a quantitative survey of 326 faculty members with 22 semi-structured interviews. PLS-SEM, MICOM, PLS-MGA, and codebook thematic analysis were used. Results Performance expectancy, perceived usefulness, institutional support, social influence, and AI self-efficacy were the strongest positive correlates of faculty attitude, while perceived risk showed a significant negative association. The model explained 62.1% of variance in attitude, 52.7% in adoption intention, and 48.3% in self-reported adoption behavior. Discussion The findings demonstrate discipline-specific adoption pathways and identify compliance-driven adoption among senior faculty as a boundary condition for the attitude-mediation mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: