In this paper, we classify 75 analytic techniques in terms of their primary function. We then highlight where across the stages of the generic analytic workflow the techniques might be best applied. Importantly, most of the techniques have some shortcomings, and none guarantee an accurate or bias-free analytic conclusion. We discuss how the findings of the present paper can be used to develop criteria for evaluating analytic techniques as well as the performance of analysts. We also discuss which sets of techniques ought to be consolidated as well as reveal gaps that need to be filled by new techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhami et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: