Key result
Self-reported engagement in cognitively stimulating activities had moderate associations with left hippocampal volume in patients with non-amnestic MCI, but not amnestic MCI.
Why the study?
Late-life participation in cognitively stimulating activities is thought to protect against cognitive decline, but its association with clinical markers of neurodegeneration is not well established.
Does engagement in cognitively stimulating activities associate with neuropsychological domains and hippocampal volume in older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment?
Cross-Sectional (n=269)
Does engagement in cognitively stimulating activities associate with neuropsychological domains and hippocampal volume in older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment?
The CSA-Q demonstrates concurrent validity with cognitive reserve proxies and reveals that cognitively stimulating activities are associated with preserved left hippocampal volume, particularly in older adults with non-amnestic cognitive deficits.
Hypothesis-generating for non-amnestic MCI; leaves open whether cognitive activities preserve hippocampal volume.
Late-life participation in cognitively stimulating activities is thought to contribute to an individual’s cognitive reserve and thus protect against cognitive decline, yet its association with clinical markers of neurodegeneration is not well established. To investigate, we developed a 13-item self-report “cognitively stimulating activities” questionnaire (CSA-Q), which was completed by a community sample of 269 older adults (>50 years) at risk of dementia. Participants met criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and were classified as amnestic (aMCI; n = 93) or non-amnestic (naMCI; n = 176). Weighted CSA-Q dimensions were calculated for activity intensity, mental engagement and social engagement via a panel of 23 inter-raters. The CSA-Q mean and its dimensions were examined in relation to: (a) demographics (age, sex), (b) cognitive reserve proxies (years of education, premorbid IQ), (c) neuropsychological markers across cognitive domains of executive function, processing speed, learning, and memory storage, and (d) neuroimaging markers (left and right hippocampal volume). Analyses were conducted for all MCI, as well as for aMCI and naMCI sub-types. The CSA-Q was found to have concurrent validity with cognitive reserve proxies. Among all MCI, the CSA-Q dimensions of intensity and mental engagement had moderate associations with left hippocampal volume, but not with neuropsychological performance. For naMCI, the CSA-Q had moderate associations with left hippocampal volume, and small associations with aspects of executive functioning and processing speed. No equivalent associations emerged for the aMCI subtype. Our findings show that the CSA-Q may be particularly useful for older adults with non-amnestic cognitive deficits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vujic et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Mild Cognitive Impairment (n=269). Engagement in cognitively stimulating activities (CSA-Q) was evaluated on Associations with cognitive reserve proxies, neuropsychological markers, and hippocampal volume. Self-reported engagement in cognitively stimulating activities had moderate associations with left hippocampal volume in patients with non-amnestic MCI, but not amnestic MCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: