Key result
Perioperative scopolamine linked to ~313% higher in-hospital mortality risk in surgical patients over 70.
Why the study?
Concerns have emerged regarding increased side effects with scopolamine, particularly in elderly patients, necessitating research into its safety and age thresholds for adverse events.
Does perioperative scopolamine administration increase the risk of in-hospital adverse events in adults undergoing major non-cardiac surgery?
Cohort (n=403,816)
Yes
Does perioperative scopolamine administration increase the risk of in-hospital adverse events in adults undergoing major non-cardiac surgery?
Relative Risk: 4.126 (95% CI 3.855–4.417)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.023% vs 1.702%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Perioperative scopolamine use in adults undergoing major non-cardiac surgery is associated with a significantly increased risk of severe in-hospital adverse events, including mortality and delirium, particularly in older patients.
Caution advised with perioperative scopolamine in older surgical patients; hypothesis-generating for mortality risk and needs randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Scopolamine is a widely used antiemetic in anesthetic practice, particularly for postoperative and post-discharge nausea and vomiting. Despite its frequent usage and recognized efficacy, concerns have emerged regarding the potential for increased side effects, particularly in elderly patients. Further research is needed to assess safety and determine age thresholds for adverse events. This study hypothesizes associations between perioperative scopolamine use, worse clinical outcomes, increased pneumonia, delirium, urinary retention, and readmissions. METHODS: A large, retrospective cohort study was performed using the TriNetX Analytics Network database on patients undergoing major surgical procedures between Jan 1, 2009, and March 21, 2018, to examine the impact of perioperative scopolamine use on in-hospital adverse events. Patients were divided into age groups and compared to a control group. The primary outcomes assessed were delirium, pneumonia, in-hospital death, new antipsychotic use, readmission, and new onset urinary retention within 7 days post-surgery. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias. Relative risk and risk differences with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, we identified a total of 403,816 (201,908 pairs) perioperative scopolamine users and nonusers. The cohorts of 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70 + contained 22,910 (11,455 pairs), 44,170 (22,085 pairs), 58,590 (29,295 pairs), 71,660 (35,830 pairs), 88,386 (44,193 pairs), and 118,100 (59,050 pairs) patients respectively. Across older age cohorts, after propensity score matching, perioperative scopolamine recipients had significantly increased relative risk and risk difference of delirium, pneumonia, in-hospital mortality, new antipsychotic use, readmission, and new-onset urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, perioperative scopolamine usage was associated with a significantly increased risk of in-hospital adverse events, both within the 70 + age cohort and among the 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69 age cohorts after major surgery. These findings highlight the need for careful assessment of scopolamine's risks and benefits, especially for patients aged 40 and older. Scopolamine may be most suited for post-discharge nausea and vomiting in ambulatory patients and clinicians should reassess its standard use for postoperative nausea and vomiting, favoring shorter-acting agents with fewer side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Major surgical procedures (n=403,816). Perioperative scopolamine vs. No scopolamine was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (age 70+ cohort) (RR 4.126, 95% CI 3.855 to 4.417, p=< 0.0001). Perioperative scopolamine administration in patients aged 70 and older undergoing major surgery was associated with a significantly increased risk of in-hospital mortality (RR 4.126) compared to nonusers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: