Key result
Individual differences in emotion regulation ability predicted self-reported success in regulating pain, with both processes reflected by changes in amygdalar activity.
Observational
Common individual differences in emotion and pain regulatory success are reflected in amygdalar function.
Association suggests shared mechanisms; leaves open causal and therapeutic implications for pain and emotion disorders.
Although the co-occurrence of negative affect and pain is well recognized, the mechanism underlying their association is unclear. To examine whether a common self-regulatory ability impacts the experience of both emotion and pain, we integrated neuroimaging, behavioral, and physiological measures obtained from three assessments separated by substantial temporal intervals. Our results demonstrated that individual differences in emotion regulation ability, as indexed by an objective measure of emotional state, corrugator electromyography, predicted self-reported success while regulating pain. In both emotion and pain paradigms, the amygdala reflected regulatory success. Notably, we found that greater emotion regulation success was associated with greater change of amygdalar activity following pain regulation. Furthermore, individual differences in degree of amygdalar change following emotion regulation were a strong predictor of pain regulation success, as well as of the degree of amygdalar engagement following pain regulation. These findings suggest that common individual differences in emotion and pain regulatory success are reflected in a neural structure known to contribute to appraisal processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lapate et al. (2011) reported an observational. Emotion regulation ability was evaluated on Pain regulation success and amygdalar activity. Individual differences in emotion regulation ability predicted self-reported success in regulating pain, with both processes reflected by changes in amygdalar activity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: