Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A delayed detached-eddy simulation of the transonic buffet over a supercritical airfoil is performed. The turbulence modeling approach is based on a one-equation closure, and the results are compared to an unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulation using the same baseline model as well as experimental data. The delayed detached-eddy simulation successfully predicts the self-sustained unsteady shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction associated with buffet. When separation occurs, the flow exhibits alternate vortex shedding and a spanwise undulation. The method also captures secondary fluctuations in the boundary layer that are not predicted by unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulation. A map of flow separation emphasizes the differences between the delayed detached-eddy simulation and unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes flow topologies. Statistical pressure distributions and velocity profiles help assess the performance of each model. They indicate that the delayed detached-eddy simulation tends to overestimate the flow unsteadiness near the trailing edge. Instantaneous distributions of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes and large-eddy simulation regions during buffet show that the delayed detached-eddy simulation enforces Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes mode near the airfoil even when the boundary layer gets very thick.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grossi et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: