Key result
Antithrombotic therapy with warfarin is recommended for stroke prophylaxis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation, who face a 21-23% incidence of stroke.
Why the study?
Does antithrombotic therapy with oral anticoagulants prevent stroke in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation?
Does antithrombotic therapy with oral anticoagulants prevent stroke in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights the critical importance of stroke prophylaxis with oral anticoagulants, primarily warfarin, for all patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation, regardless of other stroke risk factors.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), which was first described in 1958, occurs in approximately one in 500 people. Patients with HCM are at an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, which is not only poorly tolerated in this population, but also increases their risk of an embolic event. The incidence of stroke in HCM patients with atrial fibrillation is approximately 21-23%. Given the high risk of stroke, antithrombotic therapy with warfarin is recommended in national guidelines. This therapy should be used without regard to other risk factors for stroke that may be present. Anticoagulation with the new oral anticoagulants may be considered as an alternative; although, specific data for patients with HCM is not available. The purpose of this review is to remind practitioners of the importance of stroke prophylaxis with oral anticoagulants in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliphant et al. (2014) conducted a review in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K Antagonists was evaluated. Antithrombotic therapy with warfarin is recommended for stroke prophylaxis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation, who face a 21-23% incidence of stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: